Dedicated to my wife…

Read on to know what happens to men who marry in India

Women not required to produce evidence

Posted by iluvshrutiverma on November 15, 2009

In keeping up with the sexist attitude of the country, the Delhi court has ruled that – Asking a girl for evidence is insulting her.

The basic principal on which the whole Indian society is based – Women never lie.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rape-victims-testimony-sufficient-to-convict-accused-Court/articleshow/5232053.cms

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has said the testimony of a rape victim is “sufficient” enough to convict the accused and asking her to corroborate her

version by producing more witnesses will be insulting.
“The statement of the prosecutrix alone is sufficient and needs no corroboration. The conviction can be founded alone unless there are compelling reasons.
“In my opinion, it would be adding insult to tell a female that her story of woes would not be believed unless it is corroborated in material particulars in the case,” District and Sessions Judge P S Teji, quoting various judgements of the Supreme Court, said.
The court’s observation came while awarding rigorous life imprisonment to convict Raju, a resident of east Delhi for raping his five-year-old neighbour.
It trashed the plea of convict that he was implicated by the girl and her family members as no independent witness was examined against him by the prosecution.
“In the traditional non-permissive bounds of India, no girl or woman would falsely implicate somebody for ravishing her chastity by sacrificing and jeopardising her future prospects,” it said, lending credence to testimonies of the victim and her parents.
It also imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on convict, who raped the minor on the night of May 31, 2006 after taking her to a secluded place.

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court has said the testimony of a rape victim is “sufficient” enough to convict the accused and asking her to corroborate her
version by producing more witnesses will be insulting.
“The statement of the prosecutrix alone is sufficient and needs no corroboration. The conviction can be founded alone unless there are compelling reasons.
“In my opinion, it would be adding insult to tell a female that her story of woes would not be believed unless it is corroborated in material particulars in the case,” District and Sessions Judge P S Teji, quoting various judgements of the Supreme Court, said.
The court’s observation came while awarding rigorous life imprisonment to convict Raju, a resident of east Delhi for raping his five-year-old neighbour.
It trashed the plea of convict that he was implicated by the girl and her family members as no independent witness was examined against him by the prosecution.
“In the traditional non-permissive bounds of India, no girl or woman would falsely implicate somebody for ravishing her chastity by sacrificing and jeopardising her future prospects,” it said, lending credence to testimonies of the victim and her parents.
It also imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on convict, who raped the minor on the night of May 31, 2006 after taking her to a secluded place.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: